In the history of legal ideology, fact-value dichotomy represents criticism and negation of analytical positivist jurisprudence to natural jurisprudence. 事实与价值二分法在法律思想史上的表现即是分析实证法学对自然法学的批判否定。
Moralization of legal and Legalization of Morality: Analytical Jurisprudence Views of Rite and Law 法律的道德化与道德的法律化&分析法学视角中的礼与法
This dissertation analyses the problem of untitled disposition in traditional Jurisprudence with the method of systemization which belong to the approach of Analytical Jurisprudence. 本文主要运用分析法学的体系化的方法对传统民法上的无权处分问题作了系统考察。
On the jurisprudential meaning and realm of normative words: Reflection based on the transformation from new analytical jurisprudence to deontic logic 规范性语词的法理意义与范围&基于转向规范逻辑学的新分析法学的立场
The Inherent Relationship between Utilitarianism and Analytical Jurisprudence 功利主义与分析法学之间的内在关联
Hobbes is a precursor of modern positivism and analytical jurisprudence. 霍布斯是现代实证主义法学和分析法学的先驱。
The traditional analytical jurisprudence mainly involved in two basic questions: First, What is the nature of law? 传统分析法理学主要关涉到两个基本命题:第一是法的本质是什么;
According to the analytical jurisprudence, the norms of authorized legislation in the civil law can be divided into two types: those authorized legislation power and those authorized intermediation. 按照分析法学的思想,民法典中的授予立法权规范的法律分为授予立法性权力的法律和授予调整性权力的法律两种。
Contemporary mainstream jurisprudence is obviously divided into three schools, that is, natural jurisprudence studying the value of law, analytical jurisprudence studying legal standard and social jurisprudence studying society. 当代的主流法律哲学明显地分成三个学派。即研究法律价值的自然法学、研究法律规范的分析法学和研究社会的社会法学。
Pure Jurisprudence, advocated by Kelson, is the major school in Western analytical Positivist jurisprudence. 凯尔森首倡的纯粹法学是西方法哲学中分析实证主义法学的一个主要流派。
Ever since the late Qing Dynasty, legal modernization in China has been influenced immensely by analytical positivist jurisprudence. However, there have been serious changes in legal positivism in contemporary legal research since the late 1970s. 中国法制现代化进程自清末启动之初,就受到分析实证主义法学的深刻影响,但在70年代末以来的当代中国法学研究中,法律实证主义已严重畸变。
The dissertation firstly makes a comprehensive and further analysis of negligence objectifying, adopting the ways of analytical jurisprudence, comparative jurisprudence and juridical economics. 本文使用了分析法学、比较法学和法经济学等多种方法,第一次对过失客观化这一问题做了全面、深入的分析。
The methodology of new analytical positivist jurisprudence, the famous user of which is Hart is the typical example. 以哈特为代表的新分析实证主义法学方法便是逻辑和经验实证主义方法结合的典型例证。
In the process of constructing the legal order in contemporary China, the methodology of analytical positivism in its original sense, represented by Pure Jurisprudence, and legal efficiency, are very instructive. 在构建当代中国法治秩序的过程中,纯粹法学代表的本来意义上的分析实证主义法学极具特色的分析实证研究方法和关于法律规范效力性的基本观点极富启发意义。
Then the paper exposes the consistency of methodological theory of Institutional Theory of Law and traditional Legal Positivism by illustrates the progress of Analytical Jurisprudence and the characters of its theory. 通过论证分析实证法学的思想演进与理论特征,揭示出制度法学与实证主义法学思想的一脉相承。
Analytical jurisprudence makes law as order of ruler. New natural law emphasizes morality and justice. 新自然主义法学强调法律的道德性、公平、正义理念;
But how to treat the relations between validity of law and morality is an eternal difficult problem to the analytical jurisprudence. 但是该如何处理法律效力与道德的关系又是分析实证主义法学的法律效力理论永远需要面对的难题。
At the same time, research of analytical jurisprudence continues breaking their tradition of innovation. 同样,分析法学的研究也以自身的传承不断突破创新。
On the other hand, without the normative analytical method, jurisprudence will lose its method character and its independence. 反之,如果其他法学研究方法脱离了规范分析方法就会失去其所服务的中心,法学也会因此而失去独立性。
Certainly, normative analytical method is the core method of jurisprudence. 毫无疑问,在各种法学研究方法中,规范分析方法始终是核心方法。
Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart is a British jurists, the founder of modern positivism and analytical jurisprudence. 哈特(HerbertLionelAdolphusHart)是英国法理学家,新分析实证主义法学创始人。
Recourse to human subjectivity, equality and freedom, it breaks away from the perspective of legal rights, namely the ideas of legal rights of analytical jurisprudence, and explains the legitimacy of right, as well as gives right the significance of value. 其主要特点是跳出法律权利的视域,摆脱分析法学范式的观念规制,通过诉诸人的主体性、平等、自由等价值,来阐释权利的正当性,或者说,赋予权利以正当性的价值意涵。